This site is a service of CenaCom

Out-of-Court Dispute ResolutionProcedures at a Glance

Out-of-court dispute resolution procedures offer parties a structured and legally compliant way to resolve conflicts without initiating court proceedings. These procedures create space for agreement, help preserve business relationships, and enable confidential clarification of disputed issues.

Compare Procedures

Overview of the Procedures

The following procedures form the framework for out-of-court dispute resolution conducted by CenaCom. Each procedure follows a defined structure and clear responsibilities. Data protection and confidentiality are fundamental principles. The duty of confidentiality is set out in Section 4 of the German Mediation Act.

1

State-Approved Conciliation Procedure (Güteverfahren)

The state-approved conciliation procedure serves to formally resolve disputes through an enforceable settlement before a recognized dispute resolution body (formerly: conciliation body). The resulting settlement is enforceable and suspends the statute of limitations. It is particularly suitable for civil and commercial disputes, such as claims or contract conflicts.

Legal basis: Section 794 (1) No. 1 of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO).

2

Conciliation (with Proposal)

In a Conciliation (Schlichtung), a neutral conciliator provides the parties with a proposed solution. The goal is a voluntary agreement. If a settlement is reached, it may be declared enforceable upon request. This procedure is suitable for commercial disputes or disagreements between contractual partners.
3

Mediation

Mediation is a structured process in which the parties, guided by a neutral mediator, work out their own solution. It is fully voluntary and suitable for internal, institutional, or complex conflicts in which long-term understanding and future-oriented cooperation are central.

Legal basis: German Mediation Act (MediationsG).

Comparison of the Procedures

State-Approved Conciliation Procedure

Outcome

Enforceable settlement

Legal Effect

Enforceable; suspends limitation

Duration

1-3 months

Typical Use

Claims, contract disputes

Conciliation (with Proposal)

Outcome

Proposal / settlement

Legal Effect

Voluntary; can become enforceable

Duration

4-6 weeks

Typical Use

Commercial disputes

Mediation

Outcome

Agreement

Legal Effect

Voluntary

Duration

Variable

Typical Use

Internal or institutional conflicts

When is which procedure suitable?

The choice of procedure depends on the objective you wish to achieve and on the current state of the conflict. Time, costs, and interpersonal dynamics are key factors in this decision.

If you wish to initiate a procedure before the CenaCom Dispute Resolution Office, we take care of all organisational steps. Our team of experienced mediators and conciliators, with backgrounds in law, business, engineering, and public administration, supports you throughout the entire process, from submitting the application to reaching an enforceable settlement.

When deadlines are approaching or the suspension of limitation is required:

The conciliation procedure (state-approved; known as “Güteverfahren”) is appropriate when legal deadlines must be met or an enforceable settlement is required.

When mutual understanding is the priority:

Mediation is suitable when the parties wish to develop a solution independently and maintain their ongoing relationship.

When a neutral proposal is desired:

Conciliation (with proposal) is helpful when a neutral third party is expected to propose a realistic and balanced solution without issuing a binding decision.

Benefits of CenaCom

News

Guide

Conflict Management

The Conflict Management or Dispute Management System (DMS) ensures a uniform, transparent, and traceable workflow for all dispute resolution procedures within an organization. It supports the structured recording, documentation, and administration of procedures and thereby improves internal processes for handling conflicts.

Court opinions: Use of AI leads to loss of remuneration

A ruling by the Darmstadt Regional Court makes it clear that the undisclosed use of…

Arbitration ruling on stadium renovation: Legal certainty for Chemnitz

The long-standing legal dispute over the renovation of the stadium on Gellertstraße in Chemnitz was…

Mediation in property disputes: A way out of the impasse

After almost 15 years of legal deadlock, a real estate dispute shows how mediation proceedings…