This site is a service of CenaCom
Guide

Conciliation

Conciliation is an out-of-court dispute resolution process based on mutual understanding supported by a neutral professional assessment. Its purpose is to reach an agreed solution when the parties hold differing views on a clearly defined set of facts.

Conciliation is conducted by a recognized dispute resolution body and concludes with a recommendation or settlement proposal issued by the conciliator, which both parties may choose to accept.

Procedure Steps

At the outset, the procedural rules, competence, and overall structure of the process are defined. Both parties are informed about the framework, the role of the conciliator, and the legal basis of the procedure.

1

Introduction

The procedural rules, competence, and overall structure are established. Both parties are briefed on the framework, the role of the conciliator, and the applicable legal foundations.
2

Positions

The parties present their views, arguments, and relevant documents. The goal is to fully understand the facts and identify the key issues in dispute.
3

Interests

The underlying interests and motivations of both parties are explored. This analysis forms the basis for identifying possible areas of mutual understanding.
4

Solution Phase

Based on the information provided, the conciliator develops proposals for resolving the conflict. These proposals are discussed with both parties, refined, and—where possible, translated into an agreed settlement.
5

Conciliator’s Recommendation

If no agreement is reached, the conciliator prepares a written recommendation summarizing the outcome. It contains a professionally substantiated proposal that may serve as a basis for a voluntary settlement. If the parties accept the proposal, the settlement can be made enforceable under Section 794 (1) No. 1 of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO).

Key Features

Conciliation procedures are particularly suitable when conflicts can be handled in a standardized manner and when expert assessment contributes to resolving the matter. They are well suited to cases involving clear processes, recurring patterns, or sector-specific structures.

Industries, associations, and organizations with ongoing contractual relationships benefit from the neutrality and efficiency of conciliation.

Essential features:

  • Expert assessment: Neutral evaluation by a qualified conciliator
  • Structured process: Clear procedural rules and transparent case management
  • Confidentiality: Non-public, full protection of all case information (Section 4 Mediation Act)
  • Efficiency: Faster resolution than court proceedings
  • Voluntary participation: Agreement only with the consent of both parties

In certain contexts, such as collective bargaining, the conciliator’s recommendation may be published, adding visibility and weight to the proposal.

Latest Articles on Conciliation

Find current developments, legal background, and practical case examples on conciliation in our expert articles.

Private arbitration tribunals in focus: What the Klesch case means for companies*

The Klesch case makes it clear that private arbitration tribunals are a powerful tool for globally active companies to challenge…

Mediation in employment law: From the conciliation committee to commercial mediation

In employment law, mediation offers a flexible, confidential and relationship-oriented alternative to the traditional conciliation board by relying on voluntary…

Hong Kong as a center for international mediation: New opportunities for business

On 30 May 2025, history was made in Hong Kong: 33 states signed the founding convention of the International Organization…

The future of dispute resolution: How artificial intelligence is revolutionizing alternative dispute resolution

For two days in June 2025, The Hague was transformed into the global epicenter of discussion about law, technology and…

A new chapter for international arbitration: UK Arbitration Act 2025

On August 1, 2025, the new Arbitration Act 2025 came into force in the United Kingdom, a much-anticipated reform. It…

Intervene early instead of reacting late: How mediation prevents bullying and burnout

Bullying and burnout are often the result of unresolved conflicts - early mediation can prevent them, promote healing and strengthen…

Business in dialog: Why mediation makes the difference in factual conflicts

Factual conflicts are unavoidable - but with mediation they can be transformed into opportunities for cooperation, trust and sustainable success.

Federal Ministry recommends out-of-court dispute resolution for major construction projects

A federal study recommends early conflict management with mediation and arbitration for major construction projects in order to sustainably reduce…

Commercial mediation: legal expenses insurers cover the costs

More and more legal expenses insurers are covering the costs of business mediation, thereby promoting fast, cost-effective and out-of-court conflict…